
An Examination of Disability Issues in Juvenile And
Criminal Justice Introductory Textbooks
This on-going study is examining widely used college level introductory
juvenile and criminal justice textbooks to determine the extent to which
disability related issues are covered.
Methodology
Fourteen textbooks were provided by six major companies: Thomas Learning
Publishing, Harcourt, Brace & World Publishing, Aspen Publishing,
Addison-Wesley Publishing, and Allen & Bacon. Five of these texts were
published in 1999, and nine were published in 2000.
Research assistants at the University of Maryland developed a protocol
to complete the analysis of each textbook. Initially, we reviewed subject
indexes and conducted content analyses; texts without an index and/or
content section were reviewed in their entirety. Each textbook was also
examined for a variety of information concerning individuals with
learning, behavioral, and developmental disabilities, attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder, and related conditions. Analysis focused on
whether the texts addressed how disabilities might effect the behavior of
individuals in correctional settings.
Each text was also evaluated for coverage of legislation - such as the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA), and Section 504 of the Vocational Rehabilitation Act
- and relevant litigation. The protocol designed for the textbook survey
included documentation categories such as frequency and context of
words/phrases referencing disability issues, and descriptive information
about the text. Each of the fourteen books were
examined one time and six of the fourteen textbooks were examined twice to
gauge inter-reviewer reliability.
Findings
Preliminary results indicate that few textbooks devote attention to the
link between disability and juvenile justice or criminal justice
issues. The lack of information about this issue is significant
because individuals with disabilities are overrepresented in correctional
settings. Thirty to fifty percent of adjudicated juveniles
have a documented disability. In addition, statutory requirements such as
the IDEA and ADA govern aspects of education and other programming for
persons with disabilities in the justice system. For example, in 1998 the
Supreme Court confirmed in Pennsylvannia
Department of Corrections v. Yeskey that the ADA applies in
correctional settings.
Please
email EDJJ with any questions and/or comments
University of Maryland, 1224 Benjamin Building College Park, MD 20742
Phone (301) 405-6462 Fax (301) 314-5757
For information
about the website or to be linked to EDJJ,
email the webmaster.
|