The National Center on Education, Disability and Juvenile Justice
  
border-06.gif
border-06-02.gif





  
Sample of Current Research

An Examination of Disability Issues in Juvenile And Criminal Justice Introductory Textbooks

This on-going study is examining widely used college level introductory juvenile and criminal justice textbooks to determine the extent to which disability related issues are covered.

Methodology
Fourteen textbooks were provided by six major companies: Thomas Learning Publishing, Harcourt, Brace & World Publishing, Aspen Publishing, Addison-Wesley Publishing, and Allen & Bacon. Five of these texts were published in 1999, and nine were published in 2000.

Research assistants at the University of Maryland developed a protocol to complete the analysis of each textbook. Initially, we reviewed subject indexes and conducted content analyses; texts without an index and/or content section were reviewed in their entirety. Each textbook was also examined for a variety of information concerning individuals with learning, behavioral, and developmental disabilities, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and related conditions. Analysis focused on whether the texts addressed how disabilities might effect the behavior of individuals in correctional settings.

Each text was also evaluated for coverage of legislation - such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and Section 504 of the Vocational Rehabilitation Act - and relevant litigation. The protocol designed for the textbook survey included documentation categories such as frequency and context of words/phrases referencing disability issues, and descriptive information about the text. Each of the fourteen books were examined one time and six of the fourteen textbooks were examined twice to gauge inter-reviewer reliability.

Findings
Preliminary results indicate that few textbooks devote attention to the link between disability and juvenile justice or criminal justice issues. The lack of information about this issue is significant because individuals with disabilities are overrepresented in correctional settings. Thirty to fifty percent of adjudicated juveniles have a documented disability. In addition, statutory requirements such as the IDEA and ADA govern aspects of education and other programming for persons with disabilities in the justice system. For example, in 1998 the Supreme Court confirmed in Pennsylvannia Department of Corrections v. Yeskey that the ADA applies in correctional settings.

Please email EDJJ with any questions and/or comments
University of Maryland, 1224 Benjamin Building College Park, MD 20742
Phone (301) 405-6462 Fax (301) 314-5757

For information about the website or to be linked to EDJJ,
email the webmaster.